A Strong M&E Platform - The PNG Case
It has been
conventionally accepted that there is little pressure coming from PNG society
for the state to perform better, especially in terms of the delivery of
essential services. Among the reasons for this, it is often argued, is a
“dysfunctional political system, characterised by poor links between: voters
and elected politicians, political parties and governments, and ministers and
public servants”.
Additionally, extreme cultural diversity, rugged geography, difficult access to most subnational settings, traditional forms of social organisation and political authority (the “big man” culture), and customary forms of societal aggregation (the “wantok” system), are also often seen as major impediments to governance accountability and transparency in the implementation of government interventions.
Notwithstanding these constraints, it is important to
acknowledge that due to a variety of factors including advances in communication
and transport infrastructure over the last decade, there is today an increasing
awareness of and demand for improved services. Consequently, a growing number
of public officials are seeking reliable information to inform decision making,
demonstrate results, and improve accountability.
Current GoPNG M&E systems are not able to
demonstrate with certainty the contribution of development funds to national
development impacts, such as improved livelihoods, better health, and improved
education outcomes.
No comments:
Post a Comment